Workflow question
Hello,
We built a workflow thinking it was working appropriately, but alas not.
We have a case where a user edits one page and the whole site has to be completely republished in case certain fields were changed that impact the navigation. But there are some conditionals: the individual page that was edited has to be published to the web server as HTML and the XML output has to be published to a file share. Then the the whole site has to be published to the web server and the web server alone. I set the content type up where the XML should be published to its specific destination and the HTML gets published to the web server. However, my publish set is sending it to both. How do I get it where the publish set only publishes to the web server? Do I just add another parameter that specifies the destination?
Thank you!
Discussions are closed to public comments.
If you need help with Cascade CMS please
start a new discussion.
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
| ? | Show this help |
|---|---|
| ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
| r | Focus the comment reply box |
|---|---|
| ^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac
1 Posted by Ryan Griffith on 19 May, 2016 11:53 AM
Hi Danielle,
Currently, it is not possible to specify a Destination when publishing a Publish Set using the Publish Set Trigger.
We recently added the ability to specify Destinations when manually publishing a Publish Set, and when configuring its scheduled publishing options, so it sounds like we just need to update the trigger to allow for Destination parameters (similar to the Publish Trigger).
I went ahead and logged an improvement for this and attached it to this discussion. You can track its progress in the upper right-hand corner of this page.
One workaround you can try is to uncheck the Publish to this Destination by default option for your XML Destination, which should basically skip publishing to that Destination unless it is specified.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
2 Posted by djsedil on 19 May, 2016 05:00 PM
Oh interesting. Okay thank you!
3 Posted by Ryan Griffith on 19 May, 2016 05:55 PM
Not a problem at all, Danielle.
I'm going to go ahead and close this discussion, please feel free to comment or reply to re-open if you have any additional questions.
Have a great day!
Ryan Griffith closed this discussion on 19 May, 2016 05:55 PM.