restrictions in data definitions
Consider the following data definition design:
A repeating group called Level-1
a field
another repeating group called Level-2
a field
another repeating group called Level-3
a field
I would like the site manager to be able to + - and edit Levels 1, 2, & 3
I would like the site content manager to be able to + - and edit Levels 2 & 3
If I define Level-1 with a restrict-to-groups for the site manager then the content manager cannot see anything.
If I remove that restriction and move it to the Level-1 field then the content manager can see Level-1 (but not the field) and is able to + - and edit Levels 2 & 3. However, the + - controls are still functional for Level 1; that's a deal breaker.
any Ideas? thanks
Discussions are closed to public comments.
If you need help with Cascade CMS please
start a new discussion.
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
? | Show this help |
---|---|
ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
r | Focus the comment reply box |
---|---|
^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘
instead of Control ^
on Mac
1 Posted by Ryan Griffith on 06 Apr, 2016 06:24 PM
Hi Jim,
Unfortunately, this is not currently possible using group/field restrictions, because they are not very robust. Specifically, you can't restrict the multiple controls while leaving the group itself visible.
My best suggestion would be to consider reworking your data definition. Perhaps avoiding the nesting or multiple groups? Or maybe you can figure out a way to use Smart Fields depending on the use case.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
2 Posted by jim.lorenz on 07 Apr, 2016 12:30 PM
Hi Ryan, thanks for your consideration and reply. I’ll come at the problem from a different angle.
Cheers
Jim
Jim Lorenz
Michigan State University
Health Information Technology
A536 East Fee Hall
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan 48824
517-355-2855
3 Posted by Ryan Griffith on 07 Apr, 2016 01:42 PM
Not a problem at all, Jim. My apologies for not being able to provide you with a solid workaround, but hopefully you are able to rework the setup to accomplish what you need.
One idea that came to mind is splitting this page/block out into multiple assets. A couple of ways to accomplish this:
I'm going to go ahead and close this discussion, please feel free to comment or reply to re-open if you have any additional questions.
Have a great day!
Ryan Griffith closed this discussion on 07 Apr, 2016 01:42 PM.
jim.lorenz re-opened this discussion on 07 Apr, 2016 05:52 PM
4 Posted by jim.lorenz on 07 Apr, 2016 05:52 PM
Thanks again Ryan
Regards
jim
Tim closed this discussion on 27 Apr, 2016 08:42 PM.